Skip to main content
Straight answers, no sales pitch / Advertising disclosure / 212-210-1851
Ranked #2 of 9 Article 9 restructuring Asset-based

Second Wind Consultants review

Article 9 business restructuring

They don’t negotiate in the ordinary sense, they separate a viable business from its debt through a UCC Article 9 sale.

secondwindconsultants.com / Published / Updated / Reviewed by the BusinessCashAdvanceRelief.com editorial team
8.4/ 10 · Strong
Business-debt focus9.2
Legal firepower8.6
Fee structure7.2
Transparency7.8
Speed8.2
Fees
Transaction-based; not published
Debt types
Full balance-sheet restructures
Minimum debt
Typically $250K+ situations
Typical timeline
Months; process-driven
Coverage
National (Massachusetts-based)
Ratings
Long operating history; strong professional referrals

Our verdict

Second Wind doesn’t negotiate in the ordinary sense. Its instrument is the Article 9 reorganization: a sale process under the Uniform Commercial Code through which a viable operating business is separated from the debt that would otherwise consume it. The mechanism is lawful and severe, and for the right business it produces something settlement cannot: a clean balance sheet.

The fit’s narrow, and honesty requires saying so. An owner holding two stacked advances and no hard assets has given an Article 9 process nothing to work with. That owner belongs with a settlement specialist. But an asset-backed company too deep for negotiation, with a bank or factor already in the picture, should have Second Wind on the shortlist.

The score reflects two deductions: pricing transparency (published nowhere, structured around the transaction) and the reality that most readers of this page (MCA-stacked, service-sector, asset-light) are outside the firm’s sweet spot.

What we like
A structural fix, not a payment plan, predatory debt comes off the balance sheet
Protects operations and receivables from UCC 9-406 interference during the process
Decades of turnaround pedigree; the referral partner for banks and restructuring attorneys
Converts personal guarantees into affordable settlements
What gave us pause
Narrow fit: no hard assets means an Article 9 process has nothing to work with
Pricing is structured around the transaction and published nowhere
The mechanism is severe; funders who lose collateral to it use other words
Who it's for
Asset-backed businesses too deep for settlement
Companies with bank, factor, or ABL relationships to protect
Owners facing personal guarantees on large positions
Who should look elsewhere
Asset-light businesses with stacked MCAs (settle instead)
Anyone who needs published, predictable pricing
Bottom line

The real thing, for a narrow slice of readers. If your business has hard assets and the debt has outgrown negotiation, talk to them. Otherwise, start with our #1 pick and ask which path fits.

★ #1 rated Delancey Street Attorney-backed MCA settlement · $100M+ resolved · no advance fee, terms in writing